Thanks Dorothy. Your reply, as always, was complete. And I remembered everything correctly from years ago. However, I do feel that section 33a is poorly written and should be clarified. New examples should also be written. As it is at present it reads “When the ink-print text … show(s) labeled statements … in NON-REGULAR type form, the body … etc. etc … but the labels themselves must be transcribed as though they were entirely capitalized”

This seems to limit the double cap situation to those situations where the text is in non-regular type, and in fact there are no examples showing a labeled statement in regular type. Of course the “Intro to Braille Mathematics” doesn’t add any clarification, as it doesn’t go beyond what is in the code.

I remembered what my teacher taught me back in the 60s, and it agrees with everything you answered, but I think someone should revisit the code.

bt