braillebud

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 81 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Table in UEB/Nemeth from network manual #34840
    braillebud
    Participant

    Got it. Thank you!

    in reply to: Networking manual sample pages with questions #34839
    braillebud
    Participant

    Excellent! Thank you Lindy.

    I was wondering about the equals sign the way it's being used in this sample. I assume then, I can divide wherever the line naturally falls rather than bringing the equals sign to the next line if it doesn't all fit on one line, correct?

    Do you think at some point the powers that be might consider letting us use UEB symbols for those nonmathematical instances? Sure seems like it would be simpler for the reader (and the transcriber).

    Thank you again. I really appreciate the help!

    Laurie

     

    in reply to: Networking manual sample pages with questions #34824
    braillebud
    Participant

    Hi Lindy,

    I've attached two transcription efforts of a table from this manual that I hope you can critique for me. I have many, many of these so I want to get it right.

    Laurie

     

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: Networking manual sample pages with questions #34797
    braillebud
    Participant

    Excellent. Thank you for the helpful advice. I should be able to make good progress this week. No doubt I will have a couple more questions along the way. 🙂

    Laurie

    in reply to: Networking manual sample pages with questions #34748
    braillebud
    Participant

    Hi Lindy,

    No screeching halt required. I've gone back and forth and back again trying to come up with a good solution so I'm really not far into the transcription. I am relieved that you confirmed (almost) everything I've been thinking! I also realized that either way, the computer commands would end being uncontracted.

    So then, do you still stand by the use of Nemeth code for the IP addresses, subnet masks, and binary representations as discussed in the post entitled "IP addresses" in this forum?

    You also pointed to the section in UEBGTM about Hexadecimal numbers so I'm not certain if you are thinking the table I asked about in the post entitled "Networking manual" in this forum should not be done differently than Kyle suggested.

    I really appreciate the time you've taken to help me figure this out.

    Thank you,

    Laurie

    in reply to: IP addresses #34734
    braillebud
    Participant

    Thank you Lindy. Your solution makes sense. The transcriber's note is a good way to make it clear to the reader, so I'm good with that.

    Except for the fact that it was requested this way, do you see any good reason why something like this even needs to be in Nemeth Code? It seems to me UEB has everything needed to represent this material. If the reader is proficient in UEB, then what advantage is there in going back and forth between codes? I really want to understand the reasoning behind these requests.

    Thanks!

    Laurie

     

    in reply to: IP addresses #34716
    braillebud
    Participant

    Here's a small sample. If the IP addresses, etc. are not Nemeth, would I use the Nemeth punctuation indicator prior to the "dot" in the equation?

     

    Convert the answer back into decimal:

    11000000.10101000.01100100.01110000 = 192.168.100.112

    The IP address 192.16.100.115 belongs to the 192.168.100.112 network when a mask of 255.255.255.240 is used.

    in reply to: Networking manual #34703
    braillebud
    Participant

    Thank you Kyle. I especially appreciate the reference to the NC rule. (Something I'd long ago forgotten.)

    Since the hexadecimal column must be in NC I think I'll try the switches in the box lines method you suggested. Inconvenient pretty much describes what transcribing that middle column will be! Oh boy.

    Laurie

    in reply to: Special Symbols list #32794
    braillebud
    Participant

    Wow, you are fast! And awesome. 🙂

    Thanks!

    in reply to: checkmark #32758
    braillebud
    Participant

    Thanks!

    in reply to: Transcriptions for native speakers of a foreign language #29964
    braillebud
    Participant

    Thank you Rebecca. I too had concerns about trying to use the Antoine Numerical Notation without some guidance. I appreciate your help. 🙂

     

     

    in reply to: adobe acrobat and braille 2000 on same screen #29821
    braillebud
    Participant

    This is what works for me: Left click (and hold) at the top of the PDF, drag to one side of your screen and release. Do the same with Braille2000 to the other side of your screen. I have a wide-screen monitor so I don't know how that will work on a smaller screen.

    in reply to: Nemeth within UEB questions #29225
    braillebud
    Participant

    Thanks to both of you. I have a better understanding now. (It certainly will be nice when/if we get some official TG guidelines regarding Nemeth within UEB transcriptions.)

    Laurie

    in reply to: Choosing an embosser #28909
    braillebud
    Participant

    Cheri,

    I have a Juliet that I'm thinking of selling. If you're interested, e-mail me at braillebud@yahoo.com.

    Laurie

    in reply to: forms #27327
    braillebud
    Participant

    Sounds like a reasonable plan. Thanks for the quick response!

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 81 total)