braillebud

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 81 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: letter indicator or not? #22727
    braillebud
    Spectator

      I would use caution with the Instruction Manual for Braille Transcribing ... it is NOT a rulebook, only a guideline. And ... thus far, I have yet to find an instruction manual without errors. In the items you listed below, it is very evident to me, that Methylcyclopropene is not a number. But you did ask what the rule stated. Perhaps a phonecall to Jennifer Dunnam can provide you with a better answer. Let me know what she says. 🙂

      in reply to: font indicators #22710
      braillebud
      Spectator

        Thank you!

        in reply to: slash and letter indicator #22595
        braillebud
        Spectator

          Regarding your last sentence: "Even if the percent sign was not there, the letter sign would still NOT be needed."

          It sure seems like there's no good reason to include the letter indicator (as far as readability), but EBAE Rule VII.28.e.(3) shows this example: $2.29/gal. with a letter indicator included after the slash. Also, the Instruction Manual for Braille Transcribing, section 12.1d(3) shows this example: $20/per hour with a letter indicator included after the slash. Even though I don't think it's a rule, do you think the cap indicators are the justification for not including a letter indicator in my example?
          edited by braillebud on 12/11/2014

          in reply to: SM (Service Mark) #22590
          braillebud
          Spectator

            Works for me. Thanks!

            in reply to: SM (Service Mark) #22589
            braillebud
            Spectator

              After conferencing with some colleagues, the general consensus is that this should be treated the same way the trademark symbol is brailled.
              Using the dots 45, letter s. Spaced as in print and listed on the SS page or at the point of usage.
              I hope this helps.
              --Saralyn

              in reply to: Bullets #22255
              braillebud
              Spectator

                We made the change separately from our discussion about the use of Formats in Nemeth transcription. It had been requested by many (including me) and was posted as stated on BANA's website.

                in reply to: Bullets #22254
                braillebud
                Spectator
                  in reply to: Brief table of contents #22364
                  braillebud
                  Spectator

                    Thank you.

                    in reply to: orthographic drawings vs. 3-dimensional figures #22191
                    braillebud
                    Spectator

                      You probably don't have the supplement to Guildeline and Standards for Tactile Graphics, which shows an example of the mat plan. The Winter 2010 edition of the Bulletin also has an article written about these block structures. The skewed angles are very difficult for a blind reader to follow. It's difficult to know whether you are following inside a shape or outside when there are so many lines. Questions #4, 6, and 8 on the lower half of your attachment should really be done using the mat plan. The others could possibly be shown as a "face-on" view, since there are not additional layers behind, but you would need to explain that you are showing a face-on view (i.e. just square blocks, no skewed angles). Question #9 instructs the reader to "make a figure", so they must be working with manipulatives. It is very straightforward for the reader to follow a mat plan and replicate the drawing. I'll attach an example, in case you haven't seen one.
                      Hope this helps!
                      Betty
                      edited by betty.marshall on 9/4/2013

                      in reply to: Arrows #22147
                      braillebud
                      Spectator

                        I don't know if that is a requirement. I confess that I don't usually mention them when I leave them out. I welcome reprimand.

                        in reply to: Numeric Indicator #22150
                        braillebud
                        Spectator

                          Sorry--I should've posted this in Tactile Graphics. Thanks so much for finding the answer!

                          in reply to: Bullet symbol in TOC entry #22156
                          braillebud
                          Spectator

                            I did confer on this one. Usually, bullets are ignored in contents and regarded only as separators and/or decorative. See Section 2.10.13 and Sample 2-17. Just bring Timed Writing to the next subentry level as shown in that sample and ignore the bullet. You can leave the page number 77 and guide dots at the main entry with Comparing Informational Texts. In this way, it's clear that Timed Writing is part of that item--all on the same page.

                            --Joanna

                            in reply to: spatial division questions #22120
                            braillebud
                            Spectator

                              Got it. Thanks Dorothy!

                              in reply to: spatial division questions #22119
                              braillebud
                              Spectator

                                No, don't extend the separation line to the left of the dividend.

                                in reply to: Series of page numbers emphasized #22109
                                braillebud
                                Spectator

                                  Yes, it does help. I was sure you were going to tell me it had to be either one way or the other. My project is for an older student who is a newer braille reader so being able to italicize those particular page numbers individually will be the better choice in this case. Thank you.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 81 total)