claurent

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 754 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Modifiers on Numbers #22758
    claurent
    Moderator

    A dot (4)(3456)(145) represents a parallelogram...so I don't think you could use (4)(3456) for the music issue. I am not a music transcriber so I'm afraid I don't have any other suggestions for you. I would suggest you contact the BANA music committee chair.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Contractions with sign of comparison #22755
    claurent
    Moderator

    Thanks Cindi. It is literary; I'll specify next time.
    Fred

    in reply to: UEB clarification please? #22752
    claurent
    Moderator

    I agree! Thank you, Cindi. I'll contact BANA.
    Peggy

    in reply to: Section 11: Technical Materials #22737
    claurent
    Moderator

    To be honest, if I came across the examples in 11.3.4, I would do them in Nemeth. But 11.3.1, 11.3.2 and 11.3.3 could all apply to literary materials. As could 11.2, 11.4.2, 11.6 and 11.7. Does that help?

    Cindi

    in reply to: Section 11: Technical Materials #22736
    claurent
    Moderator

    I should have known it was not that simple! Lol.

    in reply to: diacritics #22739
    claurent
    Moderator

    There is no such thing as a diacritic hyphen in UEB. According to UEB rules, you follow print for the symbol used between syllables.

    The UEB primary and secondary stress marks are in Section 15.2 of the UEB codebook.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Transcriber Note Indicators #22732
    claurent
    Moderator

    Cindi, Glad I asked. Thank you.

    in reply to: bullets used as syllable division #22733
    claurent
    Moderator

    The BANA Formats committee is proposing using hyphens in diacritics regardless of the print symbol used. However, that is NOT yet approved. You could, in this instance, replace the bullets with a hyphen and have your TN state that. As long as you are clear to the reader what change you are making to the print.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Quotation Marks #22721
    claurent
    Moderator

    Thank you Cindi.

    in reply to: Chemistry #22711
    claurent
    Moderator

    Like this:

    [simbraille],c;5#b,h;5#e,o,h[/simbraille]

    The grade 1 indicator is required before the subscript indicator.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Dot locators #22687
    claurent
    Moderator

    This is a book that is teaching braille -- the student is learning the actual braille sign for ch (dots 16). The heading for the page is simply (dots 16) which of course will read as "child" in this contracted environment. Another page heading is "his was were" which can be misread as "have just go" or perhaps as punctuation (although the Grade 1 indicator would be needed there, and 2356 now has no Grade 1 meaning) ... so I thought dot locators would be needed there as well. I think I'll go with dot locators for "use". Thanks for the conversation.

    in reply to: UEB training curriculum for teachers #22696
    claurent
    Moderator

    I do not know of any courses currently available. I do believe there are some in the works. I would suggest you contact AER or one of the universities that teach braille to teachers. I know the universities have begun to teach it, but I do not know what curriculum they are using. I asked around a bit and could not find out anything else more specific. I will continue to look into this and let you know if I hear of anything. I do know that Hadley School for the Blind has some free courses aimed at teaching UEB to braille readers...but I do not know if that curriculum is available to teachers.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Dot locators #22686
    claurent
    Moderator

    Are you referencing a book that is teaching braille (the actual braille sign for ch) or are you referencing a book that is teaching grammar? In a grammar book, I would use the uncontracted letters ch as the heading. No grade 1 indicator required and no dot locator required. If this is a braille lesson and the braille sign for ch is being taught, I would do the ch uncontracted and then follow it with the contraction to demonstrate the concept.

    Cindi

    in reply to: Labels, Edited Copy, Symbols and Math #22689
    claurent
    Moderator

    I'm standing in for Joanna for this one...Let's see if I can handle all your questions (I'm adding my own numbers for clarity):

    1. I can't find the original question regarding marginal labels. It sounds like you have that right...if you still have questions about that can you please repost it - either here or on the UEB forum?

    2. In regards to items listed on the symbols page of a UEB document, for the time being, we have been noting any character that may be new or unfamiliar to our customer base, including but
    not limited to punctuation and indicators that have changed configurations and/or use, along with those that are currently listed based on EBAE and BF guidelines. Is this necessary or
    should we just follow the general guidelines of unfamiliar or rarely used characters?

    ANSWER: I don't know if it's necessary, but it's probably helpful for the reader to list symbols that are unfamiliar to them. There will be a list of what symbols will be required on the Special Symbols page in the updated Formats book.

    3. In the UEB sample documents listed below there is a note similar to “The Following Unified English Braille symbols are used in the instructions. This List is in braille order and each symbol is preceded by the dot locator .=.” which accompanies the symbols lists used in the document: Is this something that should be noted in documents to aid the braille reader during the transition period from EBAE to UEB or were these notes included as a courtesy in these particular example documents?

    ANSWER: In the documents listed (I did not include your original list, but they can be found on the BANA website) the symbols statement you note was included as a courtesy. It is not a required statement. Again, listing symbols that might be new to a reader may be a good idea during the transition...but symbols such as the parentheses will not be REQUIRED on the Special Symbols Page.

    4. It’s our understanding that the UEB Guidelines for Technical Material has not been adopted by the United States and that Nemeth code, or the Nemeth-based chemistry code, will continue to be used in formatting actual math and technical notation when applicable as outlined in the document Provisional Guidance for Transcription Using the Nemeth Code within UEB Contexts.
    However, does this apply in a non-technical text where there is only sporadic math symbols or actual math problems like that outlined in BF §1.3?

    ANSWER: Math should be done using the provisional guidelines for Nemeth and UEB. If a literary text has simple math (like "the backyard is 32 ft2 [pretend that's a superscript!]), UEB symbols may be used. If there are calculations or higher level math, Nemeth should be used - basically the same as BF 2011. UEB was adopted as a whole code (this actually includes the Guidelines for Technical Materials). Section 11 has valid guidelines for doing math. The US agreed to keep Nemeth and we've adopted the Provisional Guidelines as a a way to do that. It's been agreed that higher level math will continue to be done using Nemeth.

    If I didn't get all your questions, let me know!

    Cindi Laurent

    in reply to: UEB training curriculum for teachers #22695
    claurent
    Moderator

    Sorry for the delay in answering, I've been away. I'm looking into this and will respond asap.

    Cindi

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 754 total)