[kdejute]

That is a good, practical question.

At the top of the main Ask an Expert page, (where links to all of the forums are listed) there is a Search field and button. Entering your search terms in that field and pressing the Search button will generate a list of all topics in all forums in which your search terms appear (in the topic title and/or topic text).

I hope that helps.

–Kyle

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[kdejute]

Yes, I would say that.  I would never use a UEB numeric space in a transcription using Nemeth within a UEB context.

Thank you for asking.

–Kyle

[kdejute]

Diana,

Thank you for your question.

First, please do ensure that your print is in fact applying bold to certain numbers. Some fonts and/or printing processes can make print appear bold even though it is not.

Information on using bold for numerials is in section 32.b of the Nemeth Code.

The example you give would be transcribed in Nemeth  Code as follows:

(2+6)-3(5)+13

⠷⠸⠼⠆⠬⠖⠾⠤⠒⠷⠸⠼⠢⠾⠬⠂⠒

An example in which one digit of a number than consists of multiple digits is bold would be transcribed in Nemeth Code as follows:

(12+671)-3(59)

⠷⠂⠸⠼⠆⠬⠖⠸⠼⠶⠼⠂⠾⠤⠒⠷⠸⠼⠢⠼⠔⠾

Thank you for your attention and time!

–Kyle

[kdejute]

Barbara,

Thank you for your question.

The value $5.43 should be transcribed in Nemeth Code (see #3 on page 2 of the Guidance for Transcription Using the Nemeth Code within UEB Contexts). Similarly, any number that is paired with a dollar sign should be transcribed in Nemeth Code.

A range of numbers like "14-17" should not be transcribed in Nemeth Code.

–Kyle

[kdejute]

Thank you, Teresa, for your question.

I would say that since there are specific Nemeth Code rules for a numeral that is divided into segments (Nemeth Code sections 19 & 11.c), the example you describe should be transcribed in Nemeth Code.

–Kyle

[kdejute]

Trumbull,

Good day! Kudos to you for working to subdue your bugaboo.

I would say that the word "unit(s)" is not a "measurement unit" in the way that feet or minutes are. So, I would say that #5 on page 7 of the Guidance does not apply to the word "unit."

As with other words, if "unit" appeared in a math expression such as x units + y units = 1 order, then you should include the whole math expression "x units + y units = 1 order" within Nemeth switch indicators (uncontracted).

I have not heard any talk of changing the Guidance for Transcription Using the Nemeth Code within UEB Contexts. I believe what we have now is the official guidelines document that we will have for some time.

However, a new Nemeth course that introduces Nemeth while working within UEB context is in the works, and that new Nemeth course will include further examples and discussion of the Guidance.

Thank you, as always, for your thoughtful question.

–Kyle

 

[kdejute]

Thank you for the follow-up. In response to your question:

This will work very nicely as a tactile graphic, since the focus here is the shape of the molecules and chains and not on their bonds. I would suggest using circles with two different fill textures.

A texture key would begin the page, labeling the two textures being used so that the graphic will not be cluttered with the Hs and the Cs. Use the UEB Grade 1 symbol indicator in the texture labels (H and C).

Following Chemistry Code layout instructions, the molecular labels ("Ethylene monomer" "Polyethylene chain" and "Polyethylene Branch") should be on the line above each drawing (with a blank line before and after the drawing itself) starting in the same cell as the leftmost location of the tactile. I believe cell 1 is the recommended location (according to Tactile Graphic Guidelines).

Each pair of examples shown in the book (Ethylene monomer & Polyethylene chain and Ethylene monomer & Polyethylene [chain with] Branch) is made of two separate molecules, so print's side-by-side layout is not important -- I would start each polyethylene diagram on a new line at the margin to allow the use of the full width of the paper. I imagine they will be pretty small at only 11" wide, so I don't see any reason why you can't delete a couple of the molecules in each polyethylene chain to allow for a better graphic.

Since no Nemeth Code is needed in the drawings, a code switch is unnecessary.

May the force be with you and  your embosser never drop a dot!

–Kyle (with consulation help)

[kdejute]

Jay,

Thank you for your question and for the well attached file. Could you please give me a bit more information? Namely:

1. In what code (or combination of codes)  are you transcribing this print?
2. Are you able to present material using a tactile graphic, or are you are limited to using braille dots?

Thank you.

–Kyle

[kdejute]

Hullo, Kim:

Is your question: "What is the UEB symbol for a check mark?"

 

If so, then I direct you to a similar questions on the Ask an Expert forum:

What is the UEB symbol ...

–Kyle

 

• This reply was modified 8 years, 7 months ago by kdejute. Reason: link to previously shared information/answer on Ask an Expert forum

[kdejute]

If you need further information, please do let me know.

[kdejute]

Good day, Kim.

If I understand your question correctly, you are wondering how to transcribe the series of steps with comments at the end of your sample text.

It is almost certainly not necessary to indicate that the comment text is blue. Context should make it abundantly clear to the reader what is part of the math expression and what is comment. Add to that the use of Nemeth Code switch indicators as illustrated in the attached files, and your braille reader should be very well off.

An image of the appropriate braille is attached as well as a BRF. [I am afraid it is not possible to attach a Braille2000 file at this time.]

Thank you for your question.

–Kyle

 

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[kdejute]

My responses are in the attached file. Thank you for your thoughtful questions.

–Kyle

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[kdejute]

I would format the answers for questions 1 and 2 in 3-5, treating them as subentries to the questions, which would be in 1-5.

[kdejute]

Cindy,

I believe your question may be better suited for the UEB category of the Ask an Expert forum.

In response to your question, since your example fraction is not entirely numeric (section 6.1 in the Guidelines for Technical Material), you should use the general fraction indicators (section 6.4 in the GTM). And, since your minus/negative signs are not in the superscript position, you should simply use the minus symbol (section 3.4 of the GTM)

The following is how I would transcribe your sample fraction (simbraille image attached):

"-;("-#a./"-#b)

[The grade 1 symbol indicator is used before the opening general fraction indicator so that it is not misread as the "of" contraction. No other grade 1 indicators are used because 1) the minus symbol cannot be misread, and 2) the first numeric indicator sets grade 1 mode.]

–Kyle

 

The GTM (UEB Guidelines for Technical Material) can be found through BANA's website.

• This reply was modified 8 years, 8 months ago by kdejute.

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[kdejute]

I'm afraid that your attachment did not come through, because it is too large for the Ask an Expert forum.

Nonetheless, I may be able to answer your questions:

1. In a transcription that uses the Nemeth Code, main items should be in 1-5, and subitems should be in 3-5 (even when the main item is only a number or letter and includes no words).
2. Yes, in the phrase "less than 1/4 turn" only "1/4" should be enclosed in Nemeth switch indicators.

Thank you for the questions and for trying to include an attachment. If the above does not fully address your concerns, please do follow up here.

Cheers!

–Kyle

[Author]

Posts